CA Final Pass Percentage of Last 10 Years: Complete Guide (2015–2025)

If you’re an aspirant or simply curious about how tough the CA Final exam has been over the last decade, you’re in the right place. This in-depth blog post walks you through CA Final pass percentage trends, helps interpret them meaningfully, and gives you practical takeaways—you’ll gain clarity, for sure.

Why Does “CA Final Pass Percentage” Matters?

1. Reflection of exam difficulty over time
A low pass rate often signals a challenging exam. Tracking trends helps aspirants—and educators—understand whether the ICAI (Institute of Chartered Accountants of India) is raising the bar, adjusting syllabi, or altering evaluation patterns.

2. Informing preparation strategy
Knowing the pass percentage helps manage expectations. If only 18.75% cleared both groups in May 2025, you’ll know it’s not you—it’s the exam’s competitive nature.

3. Setting realistic goals
Seeing dips and surges in pass rates enables aspirants to set focused goals: whether to aim for one group at a time, target mixing coaching strategies, or decide on exam timing.

CA Final Pass Percentage(May/Nov 2015–May 2025)

Here’s a streamlined table capturing the essential trends—CA Final pass percentage for both groups combined, from 2015 to May 2025:

(Note: For earlier years before 2023, data is less consolidated in accessible sources.)

Year-on-Year Trends & What They Signal

1. Historic volatility
   The pass percentage has seen wild swings—from lows under 10% in late 2022 through early 2023, to a high of nearly 20% in mid‑2024, then retreating to low teens again in Nov 2024, before bouncing back to 18.75% in May 2025.
   
2. Group-wise disparity
   Consistently, Group II outperforms Group I. In May 2025, Group II’s pass rate was 26.43% compared to Group I’s 22.38%—a pattern often seen in recent sessions. This suggests Group II may contain relatively scoring or steady sections.
   
3. External factors matter
   Reports highlight that May 2025 marked “historic lows” across all CA levels—including Final—owing to tougher question patterns (especially MCQs in Audit) and heightened conceptual demand.

What This Means for Aspiring CAs

• Focus more on concepts, not routine learning: With pass rates dipping when constructs get trickier, understanding fundamentals is essential.
• Strategize exam planning: With pass percentage so volatile, don’t rush both groups together—consider attempting one group at a time, especially if you’re balancing preparation quality and stress.
• Select papers smartly: If you find Group II slightly easier, start there to build confidence while you master tougher portions of Group I.
• Track exam-level trends: Watch whether fluctuations are tied to syllabus changes, evaluation shifts, or external events. For instance, COVID-era exams saw dip patterns that required adapted strategies.

Summing Up: “CA Final Pass Percentage” in the last decade

• The overall pass percentage for CA Final has ranged broadly—from sub‑10% in late 2022/early 2023 to a near‑20% peak in May 2024.
• In May 2025, just 18.75% cleared both groups, despite stronger performance in Group II.
• Group-wise disparity persists, with Group II generally being more favourable.
• External factors—exam framing, syllabus shifts, and question design—play a big role in these swings.
• For aspirants, it’s a marathon: understand, prepare wisely, track patterns, and stay resilient.

Conclusion

You’ve read the data, interpreted the trends, and now you know why pass percentages bounce. That clarity empowers you to plan effectively—whether that means structuring your study schedule, choosing coaching priorities, or customising your mock series.

Remember: CA Final may be tough statistically, but with smart strategy, adaptive learning, and perseverance, many still beat the odds.

Key takeaways:

• Keep an eye on the overall pass percentage, especially trends across sessions.
• Leverage the group-wise difference to your advantage.
• Always anchor preparation in understanding, not memorisation.
• Treat trends as guiding signals, not determiners.